THREE COMMON ARGUMENTS AGAINST CULTURAL REPATRIATION — AND THE REALITIES BEHIND THEM
1 “It was acquired legally at the time.”
Supporters of view often cite historical permissions or trade agreements to claim igiticy.
Example: The Elgin Marbles (Parthenon Marbles) were removed from Greece in the early 19th century by British diplomat Lord Elgin, under authorization from the Ottoman Empire.
2 “We can preserve it better than the country of origin.”
Argument assumes that origin nations lack the skills or resources for proper care.
Examele: The Bust of Nefertiti was taken to Germany in 1912 and remained in Berlin for over a century.
Reality: Modern Egypt possesses advanced conservation technology and extensive experience in international exhibitions.
3 “Keeping it abroad ensures global access.”
Proponents argue that artifacts in major foreign museums are more accessible to the world.
Example: The Uigwe (Royal Protocols of the Joseon Dynasty), taken during the Japanese occupation of Korea, later in French National Library, and returned in 2011 as a long-term loan. In truth, much of the resistance to repatriation is driven not by cultural stewardship but by the desire to retain prestige, tourism revenue, and institutional infiuence. In an age of global connec- tivity, returning cultural property to its rightful home is not a loss for the world —it is a step toward justice and mutual respect.
